• Administrator
  •  
    Before your membership becomes valid, you will receive an email that must be answered.
    Please check your spam folder or this email.
     

New frsky rx

Discussion about Tx, Rx, Servo's, Batteries, Chargers, and all the other things we like to talk about..
Moderator: VinceC
User avatar
chris williams
Posts: 1573
Joined: 10 Mar 2015, 10:50
Location: Blandford Dorset

Re: New frsky rx

Post by chris williams »

Oh Barry, you really are quite the fisherman... ;)
User avatar
Andrew Ray
Posts: 88
Joined: 19 Mar 2015, 19:15
Location: Staffordshire

Re: New frsky rx

Post by Andrew Ray »

I have just had a couple of these G-RX8 receivers turn up today and noticed that the unshielded end of the aerial is 23mm whereas on my other FrSky receivers, X8R, S6R, S8R and V8R7-II the unshielded length is 32mm. A quick search shows the length should be from 29mm to 32mm.

I am a little concerned as presumably this will reduce sensitivity and thus range, does anyone know different?
User avatar
Peter Balcombe
Posts: 1399
Joined: 18 Mar 2015, 10:13
Location: Clevedon, North Somerset, U.K.

Re: New frsky rx

Post by Peter Balcombe »

The antennae are almost certainly intended to be 1/4 wavelength & this is 31.5mm at 2.4GHz.
Thus the 32mm length is probably correct and the 23mm ones wrongly cut (unless FrSky have a corresponding matching circuit inside the receiver).
Best to check with FrSky & see if a replacement is needed.
Barry_Cole

Re: New frsky rx

Post by Barry_Cole »

I have asked, but they are on Hols next week, so it may take a while.

;) ;) ;) ;)

BC
User avatar
Andrew Ray
Posts: 88
Joined: 19 Mar 2015, 19:15
Location: Staffordshire

Re: New frsky rx

Post by Andrew Ray »

Thanks for the replies, seems patience will be the order of the day.
Barry_Cole

Re: New frsky rx

Post by Barry_Cole »

It seems that the shorter aerials are good. This received this morning:-

Barry, do not worry, it is not problem. The antenna is correct, after strict testing and is matched to the hardware for best length.

So there we go then.

:) :) :) :)

BC
User avatar
Andrew Ray
Posts: 88
Joined: 19 Mar 2015, 19:15
Location: Staffordshire

Re: New frsky rx

Post by Andrew Ray »

Thanks Barry :D
Barry_Cole

Re: New frsky rx

Post by Barry_Cole »

Mark,
The 9mS frame rate is only safe for digital servos, there is a firmware update for 18mS for analogue servos

BC
Barry_Cole

Re: New frsky rx

Post by Barry_Cole »

Yes, and no in that order.

You are welcome to visit, but leave it till next week, as I have some dreaded lergy at present.

:( :( :( :(

BC
User avatar
RobbieB
Posts: 547
Joined: 07 Mar 2015, 22:22
Location: North West

Re: New frsky rx

Post by RobbieB »

You have a virus and you're on the net........!!
Post Reply