Page 1 of 1

Holding wings on?

Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 11:58
by Jolly Roger
Anybody used tie-wraps to hold wings onto a fuselage, in models where the wings slide onto a joiner that runs through the fuselage? Sturdy cup hook in each wing root, one tie-wrap clicked tight. Snip it at end of flight.

Experience? Problems?

Thanks.

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 15:10
by RobbieB
Afternoon Rog.

I've used that method in the past on sport models to which it was ideally suited. I had no problems at all with the added bonus that if you choose the size of the tie carefully they would break on a heavy arrival. Just get another out of the box and away you go.

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 15:30
by Trevor
Interesting idea. I must admit that I've generally used heavy rubber bands in that situation, which work well. However, on my AV36 build, which has a 3-piece wing, I'm still wondering what to do. The default option would seem to be a strip of tape over the joint. Other possibilities involving magnets and/or self tap screws bearing in the joiner blades are possible, but a bit of a drag. Of course, the brave option is nothing at all, just rely on the friction of the joiners. :o

Any other candidates?

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 16:11
by terry white
I like all the ideas,most I have done before all with good results, but mainly on smaller models.

However for my 1/4 scale models and over, I have changed the incidence pegs front and rear for 1/4 inch threaded bar that protrudes into the fus. onto this I slide a reasonable strong cylinder spring and compress it with a wing nut. Tighten it so that it well holds the wing in place but also allows good give on those landings in the rough. ;) Ter.

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 16:22
by Ian Davis
Yep I use this method on my 1/4 scale Schweizer 2-22. I used to use rubber bands around cup hooks in the wing roots that protruded into the very narrow centre section. While struggling with the last turn of the band in a very confined space, that well known pundit of all things wonderful (BC) offered a tie wrap. Worked a treat.

Ian ;)

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 16:29
by Barry_Cole
Trevor wrote:Interesting idea. I must admit that I've generally used heavy rubber bands in that situation, which work well. However, on my AV36 build, which has a 3-piece wing, I'm still wondering what to do. The default option would seem to be a strip of tape over the joint. Other possibilities involving magnets and/or self tap screws bearing in the joiner blades are possible, but a bit of a drag. Of course, the brave option is nothing at all, just rely on the friction of the joiners. :o

Any other candidates?
Multiplex wing locks.....

:D :D :D :D

BC

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 17:00
by Jolly Roger
Really useful replies - all of them.

I was about to use Terry's threaded bolt approach, but the model is a Piper Cub and a rough landing could rip the upper cabin structure apart. With the tie-wrap approach, the wings are just pulled together by the tie-wrap and the fuselage should have less stress.

I suspect the required tension will be small on this model for all positive G flight as the wings are naturally held against the fuselage by the wing struts.

I'll let you know how I get on.

Thanks again you lovely people.

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 18:43
by FrankS
I use rubber bands and Multiplex wing locks (not on the same model :lol: ), but another option which was used on the Glenns Maule power plane was to have plastic bolts protrude from the wing secured to the fuselage by a captive nut screwed on with the flat face first (i.e. no fiddly screws and nuts to lose), this worked well and in a hard landing the plastic bolt would shear.

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 21:07
by Trevor
Thanks guys, I'd never come across the Multiplex wing locks. I'll probably do the maiden flight with just tape then, if all goes well, look at retrofitting the wing locks.

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 13 Mar 2017, 20:30
by eric friend
Hi Trevor,

Just a short tale regarding my use of Multiplex wing locks.

I have an ex-John Elliot 4 metre Multiplex ASH25 which is fitted with said wing locks. I was offered a launch by a long standing flyer who trotted with the model, stopped and then gently thrust it skywards with the inevitable descent towards terra firma. Luckily it landed quite level so I said to the launcher to launch it again as all controls were working OK and they continued to do so throughout the next ten minutes in the air. However, when I was on the final phase of landing, it was apparent that the starboard wing lock had become unlocked as when I banked onto finals the starboard wing must have slid out fractionally, losing the electrical contact between the electrics in the fuselage and the three servos in the wing. This resulted there being no roll response ending in a heavy landing but with luckily minor damage. So now I always tape the wing/fuselage joint to be on the safe side.
I learnt a bit more about model flying from that - I'm never too old to learn!

PS - Reading the text associated with taking the BMFA Slope A and B certificates, it does state that the model should be inspected after every landing and be given an even more detailed one if it is a heavy arrival . . . and I failed to do that. Slapped wrist time.

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 13 Mar 2017, 21:16
by Elliot Howells
I like the idea of magnets! just bought a bunch of rare earth jobbies off fleabay for about £4.

I like a solution with a bit of give too, so perhaps I'm contradicting myself.

The Let monoblock is the best solution I've ever used or seen, superb retention with that bit of give should you catch a crab. Fairly cheap too.

Ell

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 13 Mar 2017, 21:17
by Peter Balcombe
Eric,
Although a great shame that the wing movement resulted in damage to your model, it is probably worth noting that (at least in my opinion), using hard mounted electrical connectors on both sides of a mechanical interface without a rigid mechanical connection is 'an accident waiting to happen'.
I appreciate that this method provides a simple/automatic electrical connection as the wings are pushed home, but it generally also means that any vibration or other minor relative movement of the male/female contacts is likely to lead to intermittent contact, or as in your case, total loss of at least one electrical connection.

Unless you use connectors specifically designed for this type of use (D type connector for instance are not) then a much better arrangement is to hard mount only one side and leave the other side as a floating connector, thus avoiding the contacts taking any additional mechanical loads and also allowing the wings to move laterally to a degree.
I appreciate that this makes rigging a little more complex, but the connections MUST be reliable.
Any Reliability Engineer will tell you that two part connectors are a significant factor in equipment unreliability, even when used correctly.

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 13 Mar 2017, 21:33
by Jolly Roger
Hey Ell,

I've been playing with magnets too, but the downside is that as separation increases, pulling force rapidly weakens. In contrast, with an elastic/spring system, pulling force increases with separation.

I also take on board Peter's well-made points about the risks of rigidly mounting both sides of electrical connectors. I've always enjoyed engineering these auto-connecting set-ups but will just mount one side from now for the reasons Peter discusses.

Ran up the Cub's motor for the first time this evening - wow it's exciting! The bummer is that I've got a major op tomorrow so will be laid low for a few months. How frustrating!

Rog

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 13 Mar 2017, 23:04
by RobbieB
Good luck Rog (but I hope it doesn't come down to that!).

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 14 Mar 2017, 21:33
by eric friend
Peter,

Thanks for your comments on my posting. I did in fact put it online to highlight one incident that I had regarding the Multiplex wing retainers and maybe that it would be of assistance to others.

I only have two of my many models with the 'fixed-both-sides' arrangement, these being models that I have acquired second hand where to modify them to single fixed connector and floating wing lead would have been quite awkward to achieve and in my opinion, unnecessary.

The ASH26 has flown very successfully for over 15 years without incident and it was only my 'senior moment' that led to the heavy landing which resulted in very minor damage which has since been repaired and which cannot be seen. The other model is a Samba 'Kobra' dating from 1997 and which never has has connectivity issues as the wings are securely taped to the fuselage for each flight.

Regarding my other models which have socket and plug arrangements, these comprise three F3F type mouldies and three large scale models, namely a 5.2 metre 1/3rd scale Purbeck MDM-1 Fox, a 5 metre ASW 17, and a 7 metre H-Models ASH 25. All have 9 or 15 pin d-sub sockets mounted at the wing root moulding of the fuselage. The connections to the wing mounted servos are via floating leads which are secured to the socket, especially desirable and comforting in the case of the ASH 25, with 10 servos in the wings and a big financial investment.

Regards,

Eric

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 15 Mar 2017, 17:25
by jimbo
FrankS wrote:I use rubber bands and Multiplex wing locks (not on the same model :lol: ), but another option which was used on the Glenns Maule power plane was to have plastic bolts protrude from the wing secured to the fuselage by a captive nut screwed on with the flat face first (i.e. no fiddly screws and nuts to lose), this worked well and in a hard landing the plastic bolt would shear.
This is the best method I've used to date. It is very secure yet will shear in a hard landing. Also very convenient.
However retrospective fit isn't really possible as it would require a nut inserting behind the wing root in a suit table solid place, which can only be done during build.

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 15 Mar 2017, 19:13
by Geoff Pearce
MarkDev wrote:I am using springs from the local agricultural supplier (£11 for a mixed box) with success, also tried Rutgersson pins ('R' pegs) but no give in them, should have used some plastic washers or similar with them. Also used some thumbscrew fitting crimping down onto brass box over steel but again not much give in the system.

The Multiplex system is ok but seems to be a system for those with strong fingers, I have to use dry lube to get them together.
Should have used the same Spring that draws your wallet back to your pocket?

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 18 Mar 2017, 14:56
by GordonT
This system would be ideal for a Cub. A bit pricey, but it's only money! Watch the video to see how it works.
http://shop.rc-electronic.com/Wing-and- ... 265&p=5570

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 21 Mar 2017, 20:18
by Chris Veitch
Hi

We discussed this issue a long tome ago and the consensus was that for wing connections there should be one fixed connection, for me normally in the wing, with the other side floating not fixed. The logic for this comes from aerotow situations when you may catch a tip which can result in the same issue as mentioned in the earlier post when a wing comes slightly apart.

Regards
Chris

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 22 Mar 2017, 07:23
by Trevor
Well, for now at least, I've gone for the low-tech (aka cheapskate!) solution - a couple of screws and a bent paper clip:

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 24 Mar 2017, 09:39
by VinceC
The world price of paper clips is about to go through the roof - neat

Re: Holding wings on?

Posted: 23 Oct 2019, 07:37
by DurgaSalvi
Many appreciated folks, I'd never gone over the Multiplex wing locks. I'll likely do the lady trip with simply tape at that point, if all goes well, take a gander at retrofitting the wing locks.